What Does the History of Morality Tell Us About Humanity?

What can the history of morality tell us about the nature of morality? And, what can it tell us about ourselves as human beings?

Morality is like a map guiding us from the way humans are to the way we think humans ought to be. It is, however, a most unusual kind of map. Most maps help you locate the starting point of the journey and the destination, and pinpoint the route that can take you from one to the other. Not so in the case of morality. On the moral map the starting point, the destination, and the route are all created during the journey itself.

The story of morality is the story of how the relationship between these two visions of the human – the relationship between how we might imagine humans are and how we envision they can be – has changed over time and across space, from Homer’s Greece to Mao’s China, from ancient India to modern America.

Our understanding of what it is to be human, of human nature, has changed over time. Additionally, what it is to be human only makes sense in light of our conception of the kind of beings we want to be, and the kind of world we want to live in.

To look upon morality as a historical product is not to degrade it, but, rather to breathe life into it – to understand morality as a human creation, to recognize it not as a fixed monument but as an evolving story. History becomes a tool through which to discover that values have changed, and why, and what it tells us about our moral lives today.

When we look upon morality as a historical product, it allows us to ask questions such as these:

  • Why were ancient Greek gods so immoral?
  • How did China manage, for more than two millennia, to create a strong ethical framework without the need for God?
  • Why did caste became so important in India?
  • Why did Augustine, one of the greatest Christian theologians, think slavery and torture were morally acceptable?
  • Why was the Europe of the Enlightenment (18th century) also the Europe of imperial terror?
  • How are contemporary claims that science can define moral norms an echo of the religious idea that values derive from God?

A historical account might undermine the idea of moral injunctions as absolute and objective, but it also reveals new ways to think of moral norms as more than merely a matter of personal preference or political need.

The Quest For Moral A Compass: A Global History of Ethics
The Quest for a Moral Compass: A Global History of Ethics
Kenan Malik

 

 

 


Kenan Malik
Kenan Malik
born 1960

. Kenan Malik (website)
. Pandemonium (website)
. Wikipedia

Kenan Malik is an Indian-born British writer, lecturer and broadcaster, trained in neurobiology and the history of science. As a scientific author, his focus is on the philosophy of biology, and contemporary theories of multiculturalismpluralism and race.

Malik has given lectures or seminars at a number of universities, including: Cambridge; Oxford; Institute of Historical Research, London; University of Oslo; and the European University Institute, Florence. In 2003, he was a visiting fellow at the University of Melbourne. He is currently Senior Visiting Fellow at the University of Surrey.

Malik has been a presenter and panelist on the BBC radio programs Analysis, Night Waves, and Moral Waves. He has written and presented a number of TV documentaries, including Disunited Kingdom (2003), Are Muslims Hated? (which was shortlisted for the Index on Censorship Freedom of Expression award, in 2005), Let ‘Em All In (2005) and Britain’s Tribal Tensions (2006). ‘Strange Fruit’ was longlisted for the Royal Society Science Book Prize in 2009.

Books written by Kenan Malik include:

 

Was Ancient Greece the Ideal Society?

In ancient Greece, since each city was autonomous, the Greeks failed to develop a loyalty towards a union of the whole Greek world. They could not organize and act together, and their lives were spent in violent conflicts. Plato, it is true, dreamed of an ideal society, but it was conceived as a city state, not a common-wealth of mankind.

A Comparative History of Ideas
A Comparative History of Ideas
Hajime Nakamura

 

 


Hajime Nakamura
Hajime Nakamura
1911-1999

Professor Hajime Nakamura was one of the great authorities in Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies.

Nakamura was an expert on Sanskrit and Pali, and among his many writings are commentaries on Buddhist scriptures. He is most known in Japan as the first to translate the entire Pali Tripitaka into Japanese. This work is still considered as the definitive translation to date against which later translations are measured. The footnotes in his Pali translation often refer to other previous translations in German, English, French as well as the ancient Chinese translations of Sanskrit scriptures.

Because of his meticulous approach to translation he had a dominating and lasting influence in the study of Indic Philosophy in Japan at a time when it was establishing itself throughout the major Japanese universities.

He published more than 170 monographs, both in Japanese and in Western languages, and over a thousand articles.

Some Books by Hajime Nakamura:

What in the World was Going on During the Time of Buddha?

When the Buddha was young, Zarathustra was exhorting the Persians, and the Second Isaiah and Ezekiel the Jews; when he became a Buddha, Cyrus was establishing his vast empire, and Confucius was twenty-three; and when he was in his seventies, the Greeks defeated the Persians at Marathon and Greek tragedy was taking shape.

Aeschylus and Sophocles were Buddha’s younger contemporaries; Euripides was probably born a year before Buddha died; Herodotus, Thucydides, and Socrates a few years later. No other age in the history of our world has seen a comparable explosion of such originality in so many widely different regions.

Buddha (563 BC-483 BC) lived to age 80. He was born at the foot of the Himalayas, in what is now Nepal, and spent much of his life traveling in northern India. His birth name was Siddhartha Gautama.

Religions by Walter Kaufmann
Religions in Four Dimensions: Existential, Aesthetic, Historical, Comparative
Walter Kaufmann

Background on Walter Kaufmann

 

 

How Did the Ancient People of India Explain the Riddle of Creation?

The ancient people of India have left an eloquent history of their efforts to answer the riddle of creation. The Vedas, sacred hymns in Sanskrit, do not depict a benevolent Creator, but record awe before the Creation as singers of the Vedas chant the radiance of this world. The luminosity of their world impressed the people of India from the beginning — not the fitting-together-ness, nor the hierarchy of beings or the order of nature, but the blinding splendor, the Light of the World. How the world came into being or how it might end seemed irrelevant before the brightness of the visible world. The Vedic hymns leave us a geology of names and myths and legends, untroubled by the mysteries of origin and destiny.

For the earliest records of India, creation was not a bringing into being of the wonder of the world. Rather it was a dismemberment of the original Oneness. Creation seemed not the expression of a rational, benevolent Maker in wonderous new forms but a fragmenting of the unity of nature into countless forms. The Vedic people of India saw the creation of our world as the “self-limitation of the transcendent.” The very notion of creation was reversed. Instead of transforming nothing into everything, the Vedas described creation as a breaking into countless imperfect fragments what was already there. The ancient Indians reached back for the Oneness that was there in the beginning and he aimed to reintegrate nature.

While the aim of the Christian faithful would be “eternal Life,” the aim of the Vedic faithful was to be uncreated. Yoga, or “union,” was the disciplined effort to reverse creation and return to the perfect Oneness from which the world had been fragmented.

The Creators
The Creators: A History of Heroes of the Imagination
Daniel J. Boorstin